Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the colour television set was eligible for duty-free concession under Rule 2(b) of the Transfer of Residence Rules, 1978 on the basis of possession and use by the passenger's family for the requisite period.
Analysis: Rule 2(b) permits the concession where the goods have been in the passenger's or the family's possession and use abroad for a minimum period of one year. The evidence showed that the television was purchased for family use abroad, remained in such use for more than one year, and the supporting documents indicated household use in the husband's name as householder. On that construction, the rule did not require exclusive use by the appellant personally, and family use satisfied the statutory condition.
Conclusion: The television set qualified for the transfer of residence concession and the claim was allowed.
Final Conclusion: The appeal succeeded and the duty-free benefit was directed to be extended, with refund of any duty paid.
Ratio Decidendi: Under Rule 2(b) of the Transfer of Residence Rules, 1978, possession and use of the goods by the passenger's family abroad for the prescribed period satisfies the condition for concession and personal use by the passenger alone is not required.