Tariff classification of hardened vegetable oil and exemption for soap manufacture remained available on the facts found.

Vegetable non-essential oil hardened by hydrogenation beyond the stage fit for human consumption remained classifiable under Item 12, because Item 13 covered only oil or fat hardened for human consumption. The intermediate hardening did not create a new excisable commodity for tariff purposes, so the product continued to fall within the broader item. Notification No. 181/71-C.E. did not withdraw the exemption under Notification No. 33/63-C.E. on the facts found, because the oil was moved under Chapter X procedure and used in soap manufacture without attracting the disabling condition relied on by the department. The duty demand therefore failed.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether hardened vegetable non-essential oil, after hydrogenation beyond the stage fit for human consumption, continued to fall under Item 12 of the Central Excise Tariff Schedule and not Item 13; (ii) Whether Notification No. 181/71-C.E. took away the exemption otherwise available under Notification No. 33/63-C.E. for vegetable non-essential oil used in making soap in another factory.

Issue (i): Whether hardened vegetable non-essential oil, after hydrogenation beyond the stage fit for human consumption, continued to fall under Item 12 of the Central Excise Tariff Schedule and not Item 13.

Analysis: The tariff entry for Item 13 applied only to vegetable oil or fat hardened for human consumption. The hardened oil in question had been processed to a melting point beyond what was suitable for human consumption, so it did not answer that description. The residual classification therefore remained under Item 12 as vegetable non-essential oil, which covered such oils in all forms, including after hardening. The intermediate hardening did not convert it into a different excisable commodity for the purpose of denying the exemption.

Conclusion: The hardened oil did not fall under Item 13 and remained assessable under Item 12.

Issue (ii): Whether Notification No. 181/71-C.E. took away the exemption otherwise available under Notification No. 33/63-C.E. for vegetable non-essential oil used in making soap in another factory.

Analysis: The later notification withdrew exemption only where the finished excisable goods made from the oil were themselves wholly exempt or chargeable to nil duty. Soap manufactured from the intermediate hardened oil was not shown to be within that disabling condition in the manner relied upon by the department. The goods were moved under Chapter X procedure and were in fact used in soap manufacture. On the proper tariff position, the intermediate hardened product was still vegetable non-essential oil, so the exemption under Notification No. 33/63-C.E. was not barred by Notification No. 181/71-C.E.

Conclusion: The exemption remained available and duty was not payable on the processed vegetable non-essential oil.

Final Conclusion: The demand of duty failed because the intermediate hardened product retained its character as vegetable non-essential oil and the later notification did not defeat the exemption on the facts found.

Ratio Decidendi: Where a vegetable oil hardened beyond the point of human consumption does not fall within the tariff entry for oil hardened for human consumption, it remains classifiable as vegetable non-essential oil, and an exemption for such oil is not lost merely because it is used through an intermediate stage in the manufacture of soap.

---