Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether special excise duty introduced by Section 37 of the Finance Act, 1978 applied to goods manufactured before 1-3-1978 but cleared on or after that date.
Analysis: The majority held that special excise duty was a duty of excise and was attracted to goods which were already excisable under the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 and on which some basic excise duty was effectively chargeable. It treated the new levy as closely connected with manufacture, but held that, for purposes of levy and collection, the crucial date was the date of removal under Rule 9A(1)(ii) of the Central Excise Rules, not the date of manufacture. Since the goods were cleared after the special excise duty came into force, the levy was held applicable even though manufacture had taken place earlier.
Conclusion: The special excise duty was leviable on the goods cleared on or after 1-3-1978, and the appeal failed.
Dissenting Opinion: One Member held that excise duty is attracted by manufacture, that a wholly prospective new levy cannot apply to goods manufactured before its imposition, and that the special excise duty was not chargeable merely because clearance occurred later.