Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, for the purpose of grant or continuance of a gold dealer's licence in favour of a partnership firm, the experience of the proposed individual partner was ative, or whether the sufficiency of expertise of the firm as a whole was the relevant consideration.
Analysis: The appeal arose under Section 81 of the Gold (Control) Act, 1968 and concerned the policy governing licensing of partnership firms under Rule 2 of the Gold Control (Licensing of Dealers) Rules, 1969. The Tribunal noted the departmental explanation that, under the Government's instructions, licensing of a partnership firm depended on the expertise available in the firm as a whole, and not on the experience of any one partner in isolation. Since one of the proposed partners was already a licensed gold dealer, the firm was treated as possessing the requisite background and expertise. In that view, the individual experience of the appellant did not require separate adjudication.
Conclusion: The appellant was entitled to be inducted as a partner in the gold dealer's licence, and the objection based solely on his personal lack of experience could not stand.
Final Conclusion: The appeal was allowed and the licensing authority's refusal was set aside, with permission to include the appellant as a partner in the existing gold dealer's licence.
Ratio Decidendi: For licensing of a partnership firm under the gold control regime, the relevant test is whether the firm as a whole possesses sufficient expertise, and not whether each proposed partner independently satisfies the experience requirement.