Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether excise duty on goods manufactured before an exemption notification but cleared after its withdrawal is chargeable with reference to the date of manufacture or the date of removal from the factory.
Analysis: The applicable charging scheme treats removal of goods from the place of manufacture as the taxable event. On a combined reading of Section 3 and Rules 7, 9 and 9A, duty liability is determined by the date of actual removal and not by the date of manufacture or production. An exemption notification does not cease the goods to be excisable, and a nil assessment does not alter the levy where the goods are cleared after the relevant notification withdrawing exemption.
Conclusion: Duty was correctly held payable on the goods removed after the withdrawal notification, even though they had been manufactured earlier.