TaxTMI Login
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Just a moment...
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether solatium received on compulsory acquisition of land formed part of the consideration for computing capital gains under the Income-tax Act, 1961. (ii) Whether the assessee was entitled to deduct the value of solatium as on 1 January 1954 or 1 January 1964 while computing capital gains.
Issue (i): Whether solatium received on compulsory acquisition of land formed part of the consideration for computing capital gains under the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Analysis: Capital gains arise only where there is a transfer of a capital asset and gain is received as a result of that transfer. The amount awarded under section 23(2) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, though described as solatium, is an additional sum calculated as a percentage of market value because the acquisition is compulsory. It is paid in addition to the market value of the land and forms part of the compensation linked to the transfer of the land. The amount cannot be treated as something unrelated to the consideration received for the land merely because it is not described as market value.
Conclusion: The solatium formed part of the consideration and was includible in the computation of capital gains, against the assessee.
Issue (ii): Whether the assessee was entitled to deduct the value of solatium as on 1 January 1954 or 1 January 1964 while computing capital gains.
Analysis: Section 48 permits deduction of the expenditure incurred wholly and exclusively in connection with the transfer, together with the cost of acquisition and cost of improvement. Solatium is not an independent asset with a separate historical cost capable of valuation on the dates suggested by the assessee. It is an additional amount awarded only because the acquisition is compulsory and is computed on the market value of the land. No deduction on account of any assumed value of solatium on the proposed dates is permissible under section 48.
Conclusion: No deduction for the alleged value of solatium on 1 January 1954 or 1 January 1964 was allowable, against the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The reference was answered in favour of the Revenue on both questions, with solatium held taxable as part of the consideration and no separate deduction permitted for its assumed historical value.
Ratio Decidendi: An amount awarded under section 23(2) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, as solatium on compulsory acquisition is part of the consideration arising from transfer of the capital asset for purposes of section 45 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and no separate deduction can be claimed under section 48 on the basis of an assumed historical value of that solatium.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
