Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee was entitled to the reduced rate of CST notified by the State Government despite production of form D instead of form C, and whether any substantial question of law arose for consideration.
Analysis: The dispute concerned the effect of the State Government's notification reducing CST on inter-State sales of paper. The Tribunal had held that the assessee's sales remained inter-State sales, the Government had consciously reduced the rate, and the benefit could not be denied merely because the assessee produced form D in respect of sales to Government departments rather than form C. The Court accepted that, at the relevant time, the applicable rate was one per cent and that there was no requirement to produce declaration form C for availing the reduced rate. In that view, the assessee could not be denied the benefit of the notified concessional rate.
Conclusion: The assessee was entitled to the reduced rate of tax, and no substantial question of law arose.