Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, on disruption of a Hindu joint family, the succeeding firm was bound for income-tax purposes to take over an outstanding debt at its market value instead of its book value while the debt was still under insolvency realisation.
Analysis: The debt was part of the money-lending business carried on by the family and was taken over by the new firm as an asset of the business. There was no legal rule requiring the assessee to revalue the debt at the date of disruption merely because the debtor had already become insolvent. The realisable value of the debt in 1933 could not be fixed by later dividends received in insolvency, as the actual recoverable amount depended on uncertain future contingencies. The debt therefore became finally ascertainable as bad only when the Official Receiver declared the final dividend and no further recovery remained expected.
Conclusion: The assessee was not bound to substitute market value for book value at the time of disruption, and the bad debt was deductible in the year when it finally became irrecoverable. The answer was in favour of the assessee.