Advance payments for post-warranty servicing: taxable only when repairs are performed; revision under s. 263 rejected.

Post-warranty service charges received in advance were not taxable as income in AY 1978-79 unless and until the assessee's right to appropriate the amounts accrued on rendering the corresponding services. The HC held that the sums remained advances because ownership and entitlement to appropriate did not vest at receipt; income arose only when repairs/servicing were actually performed and the amounts were transferred from the advances account to workshop income under the consistently followed accounting system. Consequently, the Tribunal correctly held that the receipts were not assessable in the relevant year beyond the portion relatable to services rendered, and therefore the CIT lacked jurisdiction to revise the assessment under s. 263.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Whether Rs. 1,45,490 received by the assessee under post warranty services charges was assessable in the assessment year 1978-79.
2. Whether the Commissioner of Income-tax had jurisdiction to pass an order u/s 263.

Summary:

Issue 1: Assessability of Post Warranty Service Charges
The Tribunal held that Rs. 1,45,490 received by the assessee under post warranty services charges was not assessable in the assessment year 1978-79. The assessee, engaged in the purchase and sale of tractors and motor cycles, received advances from buyers for servicing tractors post the warranty period. The Assessing Officer included Rs. 15,953 as income on a proportionate basis. The Commissioner of Income-tax, however, believed the entire amount should be treated as trading receipt in the year of receipt and set aside the assessment order. The Tribunal upheld the Assessing Officer's view, stating that the money became income when the service was rendered, not when received. The High Court agreed, emphasizing that income accrues when the right to receive it arises, which in this case was when the service was rendered, not at the time of receipt.

Issue 2: Jurisdiction of Commissioner u/s 263
The Commissioner of Income-tax took suo motu action u/s 263, arguing that the assessment order was erroneous and prejudicial to the interests of the Revenue. The Commissioner contended that the money collected under the PWS Scheme was a trading receipt in the year it was collected. However, the Tribunal found that the money received was an advance and not income until the service was rendered. The High Court supported this view, stating that the initial character of the receipt as an advance did not change merely because the assessee followed the mercantile system of accounting. The High Court concluded that the Commissioner did not have jurisdiction to pass an order u/s 263 as the money received did not constitute income in the year of receipt.

Conclusion:
The High Court answered the question in the affirmative, against the Revenue and in favor of the assessee, affirming that the post warranty service charges were not assessable in the assessment year 1978-79 and the Commissioner of Income-tax had no jurisdiction to pass an order u/s 263.

---