Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the order of the Special Committee rejecting the petitioner's application under section 16D of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959, without dealing with the contentions raised, could be sustained.
Analysis: The impugned order merely stated that the assessment was made under section 12(1) of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959 and that the case did not fall within the purview of the Committee under section 16D, but it did not examine the challenge raised to the assessment or give reasons for accepting or rejecting the petitioner's objections. A quasi-judicial authority is required to pass a reasoned order dealing with the contentions raised so that the legality of the conclusion can be examined by higher authorities. An order that is wholly non-speaking and does not address the objections raised cannot be sustained.
Conclusion: The rejection of the application was unsustainable and was set aside.
Final Conclusion: The matter was remitted to the Special Committee for fresh consideration and a reasoned decision after dealing with the petitioner's contentions.
Ratio Decidendi: A quasi-judicial order affecting rights must be a speaking order that considers the material contentions and records reasons; a non-speaking rejection is liable to be set aside and remitted for fresh disposal.