1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Don't have an account? Register Here
<h1>Dismissal of Appeal Against Education Cess on Duty-Free Imports Under DEPB Scheme</h1> The appeal under section 130 of the Customs Act, 1962 against the Final Order of CESTAT regarding the levy of education cess on duty-free imports under ... - Issues involved: Appeal u/s 130 of Customs Act, 1962 against the Final Order of CESTAT regarding levy of education cess on duty-free imports under DEPB scheme.Summary:The Commissioner of Central Excise appealed against the Final Order of CESTAT, which allowed the respondent's appeal regarding the levy of education cess on duty-free imports under the DEPB scheme. The respondent, an importer of edible refined oil, imported crude palm oil using DEPB scrips for duty payment. The Revenue collected education cess despite the plea against it. The CESTAT allowed the appeal based on previous decisions and the nature of the DEPB scheme.The Senior Standing Counsel argued that the DEPB scheme exemption is conditional and does not cover education cess. However, the notification under Section 25(1) of the Customs Act exempts the duty, additional duty, and special additional duty for imports under the DEPB scheme, subject to certain conditions. The intention of the Government was to exempt the entire duty, indicating no restriction on levying education cess for duty-free imports under DEPB.The Court noted that the Government's intention was to fully exempt duties under the DEPB scheme, without any mention of education cess. Previous CESTAT rulings on similar matters were final and unchallenged by the Revenue. Therefore, the appeal was dismissed as misconceived.