Tariff classification of shellac mixture rejected as synthetic resin; alternative customs heading and refund upheld.

A mixture of shellac and manilla gum was not classifiable as synthetic resin or plastic material merely because it showed a heat polymerisation property at 155 C. The imported goods were described as shellac bond powder, and the relevant tariff entry for shellac and gums did not cover this natural-product mixture. The alternative classification under Heading 38.01/19(1) of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 was therefore appropriate, displacing the departmental classification under Heading 39.01/06 and Item 15A of the Central Excise Tariff. On that basis, the appellants were entitled to re-assessment and consequential refund.

---

---

Issues: Whether shellac bond powder, consisting of 80% shellac and 20% manilla gum, was correctly classifiable under Heading 38.01/19(1) of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975, and whether the appellants were entitled to re-assessment and consequential refund.

Analysis: The goods were described in the import documents as shellac bond powder and the purchase specification showed a heat polymerisation property at 155 b0C, but that feature did not establish that the goods as imported were already polymerised or that they were synthetic resins or plastic material. The departmental classification under Heading 39.01/06 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 and Item 15A of the Central Excise Tariff was held to be inappropriate. Heading 13.02 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 covered shellac and gums, but not the imported mixture of the two natural products. Such mixtures were held to fall under the alternative Heading 38.01/19(1) of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975.

Conclusion: The goods were held classifiable under Heading 38.01/19(1) of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975, and the appellants were held entitled to re-assessment and consequential refund.

Final Conclusion: The appeal succeeded and the departmental assessment was displaced in favour of the alternative tariff classification claimed by the appellants.

Ratio Decidendi: A mixture of natural products cannot be classified as synthetic resin or plastic material merely because it possesses a heat polymerisation property, and tariff classification must follow the nature of the imported goods as actually brought in.

---