Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether duty on cotton yarn, collected under the special compounded levy procedure at the time of clearance of cotton fabrics, was includible in the assessable value of the cotton fabrics for levy of excise duty; and whether the demand resulted in double taxation or was affected by the subsequent exemption notification.
Analysis: The special procedure for composite mills did not grant exemption from duty on cotton yarn; it only shifted the stage and manner of collection of that duty to the time of clearance of fabrics. For the purposes of Section 4(4)(d)(ii) of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944, the expression "such goods" referred to the fabrics being cleared, and the deferred yarn duty formed part of the cost of manufacture and therefore had to enter the assessable value. The plea of double taxation failed because the yarn and the fabrics were taxed under different tariff items at different rates. The exemption notification issued later also supported the position that, absent exemption, the yarn-duty element was otherwise includible in the value of the fabrics.
Conclusion: The duty on cotton yarn was rightly included in the assessable value of the cotton fabrics, and the challenge to the demand failed.