Refund Limitation Under Excise Rules Runs From P.L.A. Debit, Not R.T. 12 Assessment

For limitation under Rule 11 of the Central Excise Rules, 1944, the relevant date of payment of duty is the date on which duty is debited in the P.L.A., because duty under the excise scheme is paid in the manner prescribed by the rules and removal of goods cannot occur without such payment. Assessment of the R.T. 12 return under Rule 173-I does not determine the date of payment for refund limitation purposes. Authorities dealing with provisional assessments were treated as inapplicable to this final-assessment context. The refund claim was therefore time-barred and rejection was upheld.

---

---

Issues: Whether, for the purpose of limitation under Rule 11 of the Central Excise Rules, 1944, the date of payment of duty should be taken as the date of assessment of the R.T. 12 return under Rule 173-I or the date of debit in the P.L.A.

Analysis: Duty under Section 3 of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 is payable in the manner prescribed by the rules. Rules 9 and 49 require that goods cannot be removed from the factory without payment of duty, and the payment is effected when the duty is debited in the P.L.A. Rule 173-I assessment of the R.T. 12 return does not determine the date of payment for refund limitation purposes. The reliance placed on administrative orders and authorities dealing with provisional assessments was held to be inapplicable, because the present case concerned final assessments under the excise scheme.

Conclusion: The date of payment of duty for Rule 11 limitation is the date of debit in the P.L.A., not the date of assessment of the R.T. 12 return. The refund claim was therefore time-barred and the rejection was upheld.

---