Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, under Notification No. 47/72-C.E. dated 17-3-1972 as amended, a manufacturer who had not cleared any tyres or tubes during the preceding financial year was nevertheless entitled to the concessional rate of duty of 40% ad valorem in the succeeding year.
Analysis: The Notification linked eligibility to the value of clearances, but did not expressly require that there must in fact have been clearances in the preceding financial year. A construction that made actual prior clearances a condition precedent would deny the concession to a manufacturer with no clearances at all, while allowing it to one who had some clearances within the prescribed limit. Such an interpretation would defeat the object of the exemption and produce an anomalous and invidious result. The better construction was that, where there had been prior clearances, their value should not exceed the stipulated limit, and that absence of any prior clearance did not disqualify the manufacturer, provided the other conditions of the Notification were satisfied.
Conclusion: The manufacturer was entitled to the benefit of Notification No. 47/72-C.E. in the succeeding financial year despite having cleared no tyres or tubes in the preceding year, subject to fulfilment of the other conditions of the Notification.
Ratio Decidendi: A beneficial exemption notification tied to the value of preceding year clearances must be construed purposively so that absence of any prior clearance does not deny the concession unless the notification expressly so provides.