Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a catalyst solution containing duty-paid polyamide/amino resin dissolved in solvent constituted a new excisable resin under Item 15-A(1)(i) of the Central Excise Tariff, or whether the two-pack system had to be assessed together as paint under Item 14-I(5).
Analysis: The decisive consideration was that the resin component had already suffered duty and only its physical form had changed from solid to liquid solution. A mere change in form does not create a new dutiable resin where there is no finding of chemical alteration or change in character of the resin itself. The two constituents were cleared in separate packs for immediate mixed use as zinc rich epoxy primer, and were treated as one functional substance for application as paint. On that basis, the catalyst solution could not be subjected to fresh duty as a new resin.
Conclusion: The catalyst solution was not independently assessable as a new resin under Item 15-A(1)(i), and the two-pack product was assessable together as paint under Item 14-I(5), in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: A duty-paid resin does not become a new excisable commodity merely because its physical form changes, unless there is a proven change in its chemical character or identity; a two-pack product intended for joint use may be assessed as a single composite product where its components are cleared and used together as one functional substance.