Fused silica laboratory goods classified under residuary customs entry; countervailing duty denied for lack of tariff coverage.

Non-transparent crucibles and basins made of fused silica and used in laboratories were not scientific and surgical instruments, apparatus or appliances merely because of their laboratory use, and they were not glassware because they were non-transparent. As no specific tariff heading covered them, they fell under the residuary customs entry. For countervailing duty, the same goods were neither chinaware, porcelainware, glazed clayware nor glassware, and in the absence of a covering excise item, no countervailing duty was payable. The importer was therefore entitled to refund of the countervailing duty component.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether non-transparent crucibles and basins of fused silica were classifiable under Item 77(2) of the Indian Customs Tariff as scientific and surgical instruments, apparatus and appliances, or under the residuary Item 87. (ii) Whether the same goods were liable to countervailing duty under Item 23B(4) of the Central Excise Tariff as chinaware, porcelainware or glazed clayware, or under Item 23A(2) as glassware, or were not liable to countervailing duty at all.

Issue (i): Whether non-transparent crucibles and basins of fused silica were classifiable under Item 77(2) of the Indian Customs Tariff as scientific and surgical instruments, apparatus and appliances, or under the residuary Item 87.

Analysis: The goods were plain crucibles and basins, albeit made of fused silica and used in laboratories. Mere laboratory use did not make them scientific instruments, apparatus or appliances. They were also not glassware because they were made of non-transparent fused silica. As no specific tariff heading covered them, the residuary entry had to be applied.

Conclusion: The goods were not classifiable under Item 77(2) and were correctly assessed under Item 87 of the Indian Customs Tariff.

Issue (ii): Whether the same goods were liable to countervailing duty under Item 23B(4) of the Central Excise Tariff as chinaware, porcelainware or glazed clayware, or under Item 23A(2) as glassware, or were not liable to countervailing duty at all.

Analysis: The goods were neither chinaware nor porcelainware nor glazed clayware. They were also not glassware because of their non-transparent fused silica composition. Since no other excise item covered them at the relevant time, the goods were non-excisable for countervailing duty purposes.

Conclusion: The levy of countervailing duty was not sustainable and no countervailing duty was payable.

Final Conclusion: The appeal failed on basic customs classification but succeeded on the countervailing duty issue, entitling the importer to consequential refund on that component.

Ratio Decidendi: Goods used in laboratories are not automatically scientific instruments, and non-transparent fused silica articles cannot be treated as glassware; where no specific tariff entry applies, the residuary item governs, and no countervailing duty can be imposed on goods that are not covered by any excise tariff item.

---