Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether HDPE tapes were classifiable as man-made filament yarn under Item 18 of the Central Excise Tariff or as articles made of plastics under Item 15A(2), and whether they were entitled to exemption under Notification No. 68/71-C.E.
Analysis: HDPE tapes were treated as yarn in a broad sense because they were used for weaving fabrics and for making twines and ropes, but the decisive question was whether they were filament yarn. The Tribunal relied on the textile glossary definitions and the manufacturing process, noting that filament denotes a fibre of indefinite length, while the impugned tapes were made by slitting HDPE film into strips and stretching them. On that basis, the tapes were held to be split film yarn or narrow strip yarn, distinct from filament yarn. Since Item 18 covered only the specified categories of man-made fibres and yarn and did not include the impugned tapes, they did not fall within that entry. As HDPE is a plastic raw material and the tapes were articles made therefrom, they were held classifiable under Item 15A(2) and covered by the exemption under Notification No. 68/71-C.E.
Conclusion: The HDPE tapes were not man-made filament yarn under Item 18 but were articles of plastic under Item 15A(2), and the exemption under Notification No. 68/71-C.E. applied in favour of the assessee.