Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Additional Collector was competent to reopen a demand for duty on hard coke after the matter had already been disposed of by the Assistant Collector.
Analysis: The hard coke was used in the manufacture of coke oven gas and, in turn, fertilizers in the same factory. Notification No. 58/75 dated 1-3-75 exempted goods manufactured in the factory and used for producing goods falling under Tariff Item 68, and Notification No. 77/75 dated 6-3-75 widened the exemption to similar goods whether or not they were used in the manufacture of Item 68 goods. The Assistant Collector had already considered the demand on that basis and had passed orders accordingly. In that situation, the same demand could not validly be reopened by the Additional Collector through a fresh demand.
Conclusion: The Additional Collector's order was not legally sustainable and the demand and penalty were set aside in favour of the assessee.