Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether benzene and toluene obtained at concessional rate of duty were covered by Notification No. 34/73-C.E. dated 1-3-1973 when used in the manufacture of malathion (technical), and whether such use satisfied the requirement that they be used as solvents in the formulation of pesticidal solutions, sprays and suspensions.
Analysis: The notification was construed by giving the word "formulation" its technical and chemical meaning. The Board accepted the dictionary definition relied upon, under which formulation covered the process in which the motor spirit was used. On the facts, benzene and toluene were used as solvent medium in the process of manufacture of malathion (technical), and the departmental record itself showed that the intended use was as solvents. The distinction sought to be drawn between "manufacture" and "formulation" was held to be without worthwhile distinction for the purpose of the notification.
Conclusion: The appellants were entitled to the concessional duty benefit under Notification No. 34/73-C.E. dated 1-3-1973.