Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the order-in-appeal was liable to be set aside for not being a speaking order, and whether the matter should be remitted for fresh disposal after considering all points raised, including deductions towards sales tax and octroi.
Analysis: The order recorded that the appellate authority had not dealt with all the grounds urged in the appeal and had not given findings on material questions relating to the assessable value, including the claimed deductions for sales tax and octroi. On that basis, the order-in-appeal was found not to satisfy the requirement of a speaking order and was considered fit to be set aside. The matter was directed to be reheard de novo with compliance of the principles of natural justice.
Conclusion: The impugned order-in-appeal was set aside and the appeal remanded for fresh decision after due hearing and a reasoned order on all issues.
Ratio Decidendi: An appellate order that does not deal with all material grounds and fails to give reasons on disputed questions is liable to be set aside and remitted for fresh disposal in accordance with natural justice.