Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, for grant of set-off under Notification No. 198/76, the ex-factory price was the correct basis for computation of assessable value and whether the reduction in exemption under executive instructions could be applied.
Analysis: The appellate authority accepted that the duty liability had to be worked out on the ex-factory price and not on the wholesale dealers' price, since the latter included excise duty, fertilizer pool contribution, equalised freight and dealers' margin. It further held that the marginal reduction in the rate of exemption under executive instructions issued by the Central Board of Excise & Customs could not be acted upon after those instructions had been quashed by the High Court. The notification, therefore, had to be applied on its full terms.
Conclusion: The ex-factory price was to be taken as the basis for the set-off, the full rebate under the notification was admissible, and the assessee succeeded.