Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the income from the sale of latex after its conversion into sole crepe constituted agricultural income under section 2(1)(b)(ii) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922.
Analysis: Agricultural income under the Act covers income derived from land only where the agricultural produce is subjected to a process ordinarily employed by a cultivator to render it fit to be taken to market. The crucial inquiry was whether the conversion of latex into sole crepe was merely a market-preparatory process or a manufacturing process going beyond what was necessary for marketing. The Tribunal treated the process as one for making the produce marketable and applied the principle that latex converted into a saleable rubber product may still retain its agricultural character. The Court accepted that the Tribunal's finding, on the material before it, was that the process used was not more than what was necessary to render the produce fit for market.
Conclusion: The income from the sale of latex after conversion into sole crepe was held to be agricultural income, and the question was answered in the affirmative in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the process applied to agricultural produce is found, on the facts, to be ordinarily employed to render the produce fit to be taken to market and not to amount to a distinct manufacturing operation, the resulting income retains the character of agricultural income.