Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether excise duty and penalty could be demanded on khandsari sugar manufactured during a period of exemption but cleared after the exemption had ceased to operate, and whether the invocation of Rule 9 was valid in the circumstances.
Analysis: Excise duty is a duty on manufacture or production, so the relevant date for exemption is the date on which the goods are manufactured, not the date on which they are removed from the factory. Where goods are produced during a duty-free period, the later withdrawal of exemption does not make them dutiable merely because clearance takes place afterwards. The prior decision relied upon also treated the operation of Rule 9 as excluded in the relevant special scheme, making the demand under that rule unsustainable.
Conclusion: The demand of duty and the penalty were unsustainable, and the appeal was allowed.