TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
AI-powered research trained on the authentic TaxTMI database.
Launch AI Search →Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Appellate Collector rules on rebate claim for cotton seed oil in vegetable product manufacturing.</h1> The Appellate Collector allowed the appeal, stating that the claim for rebate on the percentage of cotton seed oil used in the manufacture of a vegetable ... Computation of concessional quantum under slab rates - interpretation of proviso requiring separate computation and totaling - treatment of production without specified input for determination of input percentageComputation of concessional quantum under slab rates - interpretation of proviso requiring separate computation and totaling - treatment of production without specified input for determination of input percentage - Whether the percentage of cotton seed oil for claiming rebate under the notification is to be worked out on total clearances of vegetable product or only on the quantity of vegetable product for which cotton seed oil was actually used. - HELD THAT: - The proviso in the notification requires that the 'quantum of the concession available under each serial number representing the slab rates as aforesaid shall be computed separately and totalled up.' This language indicates that concessions must be calculated for distinct quantities (slabs) separately and then aggregated, which presupposes separate groupings of production based on the presence or absence of the specified input. Consequently, total production of vegetable product during the period cannot be treated as production 'with certain percentage of cotton seed oil.' Vegetable product manufactured without any use of cotton seed oil must therefore be excluded when determining the quantum of concession available for product containing cotton seed oil. The Assistant Collector erred in computing the percentage on the entire clearances rather than on the quantity for which cotton seed oil was actually used.Appeal allowed in respect of computation for vegetable product containing cotton seed oil; percentage must be calculated only on the quantity of vegetable product for which cotton seed oil was used and production without cotton seed oil excluded.Final Conclusion: The appellant's claim for rebate is allowed insofar as the concession must be computed only on the quantity of vegetable product manufactured with cotton seed oil, excluding production made without that input, in accordance with the proviso requiring separate computation and totaling of slab-rate concessions. The Appellate Collector allowed the appeal regarding the claim for rebate on the percentage of cotton seed oil used in the manufacture of vegetable product, stating that the claim should be calculated only on the quantity of vegetable product for which cotton seed oil had been used, not on the total clearances of vegetable product from the factory. The Collector referred to specific provisos in the notification to support this decision.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
