Failure to Challenge Assessment Order: Second Revision Order Issued. Petitioner Directed to File Statutory Appeal.

The court found that the petitioner failed to challenge the initial assessment order and avoided service of subsequent notices and orders. The order from July 7, 2009, was deemed a second revision order based on new information. The court directed the petitioner to file a statutory appeal within 15 days to preserve the right to appeal and enable potential tax collection for the Revenue. No costs were awarded, and the related petition was closed.

---

---

Issues:
Challenge to assessment order under Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959 for the assessment year 2003-2004.

Analysis:
The petitioner, a dealer in edible oil and oil seeds, challenged an assessment order passed on July 7, 2009, under the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959 for the assessment year 2003-2004. The registration of the petitioner was cancelled due to failure to file returns, leading to a reassessment notice alleging undisclosed purchases of palmolein. The petitioner claimed objections were filed but not considered before the impugned order was passed. The respondent contended that prior notices were issued, and the assessment was finalized on best judgment basis in November 2007. The petitioner disputed knowledge of the earlier assessment order, leading to a detailed examination of the communication history between the parties.

The respondent produced evidence showing that notices were sent to the petitioner's addresses, with acknowledgments and returns indicating delivery attempts. Despite the petitioner's claims of ignorance, the file revealed a series of communication attempts and responses from the petitioner. The respondent issued a fresh notice in December 2008 regarding additional purchases of palmolein, which the petitioner acknowledged personally in January 2009. The subsequent order dated July 7, 2009, was attempted to be served but refused by the petitioner, who later questioned the validity of the notice.

The court found that the petitioner had not challenged the initial assessment order from November 2007 and had avoided service of subsequent notices and orders. The order from July 7, 2009 was considered a second revision order based on new information provided by the Deputy Commissioner. The court noted that the petitioner had missed the opportunity to file a statutory appeal against both orders. As a result, the court directed the petitioner to file a statutory appeal within 15 days to ensure the opportunity for appeal and potential tax collection for the Revenue. The court emphasized that all contentions could be raised in the appeal process, concluding the judgment with no costs awarded and closure of the related petition.

---