Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the revising authority had jurisdiction under section 40 of the Haryana General Sales Tax Act, 1973 to tax purchase turnover not included in the gross or taxable turnover and not assessed to tax.
Analysis: Section 40 confers revisional power on the Commissioner, including the power to call for the record of any case, pending or disposed of, suo motu, in order to reach a just and fair decision. On that basis, the question referred was answered by following the earlier decision that had construed the scope of the revisional power under the same provision. Once that issue was answered, the remaining questions were held not to survive.
Conclusion: The revising authority had jurisdiction under section 40 to deal with the turnover in question, and the reference was answered against the Revenue.
Final Conclusion: The legal position on revisional power under the statute was affirmed, and no separate adjudication was required on the remaining referred questions.
Ratio Decidendi: The revisional authority's power under section 40 extends to suo motu examination of a case to secure a just and fair decision, including matters arising from the assessment record.