Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether depreciation under section 8(6) of the Maharashtra Agricultural Income-tax Act, 1962 was allowable on the value of land cultivated by the assessee, and whether land could be treated as a capital asset or as an "other asset" under rule 3 of the Maharashtra Agricultural Income-tax Rules, 1962.
Analysis: Section 8(6) allows depreciation only in respect of irrigation or protective works or other capital assets constructed or acquired for the benefit of the land from which agricultural income is derived, or for the purpose of deriving such income. On a plain reading, the provision does not extend to the land itself, and the expression "capital asset" in that clause cannot be stretched to include land. Rule 3 merely prescribes the rates of depreciation for assets falling within section 8(6); it does not independently create a depreciation allowance or enlarge the class of eligible assets. The residuary expression "other assets" in the rule cannot cover land, which is outside the scope of section 8(6).
Conclusion: Depreciation on the value of land was not allowable, and the question was answered in the affirmative against the assessee and in favour of the Revenue.