1997 (9) TMI 39 - HC - Income Tax

High Court allows tax deduction based on accrued liabilities, ruling in favor of assessee

Commissioner Of Income-Tax Versus Munjal Shoes Co.

The High Court of Allahabad ruled in favor of the assessee in a case concerning tax liability on purchases for deduction purposes. The court held that the ... Business Expenditure, Mercantile System, Liability To Pay Purchase Tax Issues:1. Whether the assessee's liability to pay tax on purchases accrued at the time of purchase for deduction purposesRs.2. Whether the assessee was entitled to claim a deduction of a specific amount in the computation of its incomeRs.Analysis:The High Court of Allahabad was tasked with addressing two questions referred by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal regarding the assessment year 1975-76. The first issue revolved around the timing of the assessee's liability to pay tax on purchases for deduction purposes. The Income-tax Officer had brought a credit balance of Rs. 34,971 in the assessee's 'overhead collection charges account' to tax, as it was not paid to the Government but contested before the sales tax authorities. The Appellate Assistant Commissioner upheld this decision. However, the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, in line with the mercantile system of accounting followed by the assessee, held that the liability to pay tax accrued at the time of purchase, entitling the assessee to claim the deduction even if the amount was not actually paid in the relevant accounting year.The second issue pertained to the specific deduction of Rs. 34,971 in the computation of the assessee's income. The Tribunal's decision was influenced by previous court rulings, including CIT v. Poonam Chand Trilok Chand and CIT v. Brijmohan Das Laxman Das, supporting the accrual of liabilities for deduction purposes. The Tribunal's decision was further supported by a Supreme Court case, Jonnalla Narashimharao and Co. v. CIT, where the court allowed a deduction for an amount collected as sales tax but not deposited with the Government, as the assessee maintained accounts on a mercantile basis.In conclusion, the High Court, following the precedents set by the Supreme Court, answered both questions in the affirmative, favoring the assessee and ruling against the Revenue. The judgment emphasized the importance of recognizing accrued liabilities for deduction purposes, even if the actual payment had not been made in the relevant accounting year.