Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the notification exempting tax payable under section 5 of the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957 on diesel sold to fishermen also exempted cess payable under section 6D of the Act.
Analysis: The notification issued under section 8A exempted only the tax payable under section 5 on diesel sold for fishing activities. Section 6D provided for cess in addition to the tax payable under sections 5, 5B, 5C and 6, making cess dependent on the existence of tax liability under the charging provisions. The levy was not treated as an independent impost in the context of the exemption. Although exemption notifications are generally construed strictly, the wording of section 6D and the object of the notification showed that exemption from the basic tax necessarily carried exemption from the incremental cess. The authorities failed to give effect to the express dependency built into section 6D.
Conclusion: The notification did exempt cess under section 6D, and the levy of cess could not be sustained once the basic tax under section 5 stood exempted.