Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether freight charges and trade tax, when separately charged in the bills, form part of turnover under section 2(i), Explanation II(i) of the U.P. Trade Tax Act, 1948.
Analysis: The statutory definition of turnover excludes freight or delivery charges and the amount realised as trade tax when such amounts are separately charged. The decisive question was whether the dealer had separately charged and realised these amounts, which had to be determined from the bills and other reliable material on record. The separate bills and supporting certificate showed that the goods price, freight, and trade tax were charged distinctly, and no documentary basis existed for the presumption that the charges were inclusive in the sale price. The assessing authority could not disregard the best evidence on record and include the separately charged amounts in turnover on a hypothetical assumption of an inclusive arrangement.
Conclusion: Freight charges and trade tax separately charged and separately realised were not includible in turnover, and the assessee was entitled to exemption on those amounts.
Ratio Decidendi: Amounts expressly and separately charged towards freight or trade tax do not form part of turnover under the statutory definition and cannot be added to taxable turnover in the absence of a finding that they were included in the sale price.