Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful)

TaxTMI AI Drafter workflow from input facts to final legal draft Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :
        VAT and Sales Tax

        2010 (8) TMI 853 - HC - VAT and Sales Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Reassessment approval and section 3AB pricing: separate pricing of packing material falls outside exemption, while change of opinion bars reopening. Approval for reassessment under the proviso to section 21(2) of the U.P. Trade Tax Act need not contain elaborate separate reasons if the approving ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
                        Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.

                            Reassessment approval and section 3AB pricing: separate pricing of packing material falls outside exemption, while change of opinion bars reopening.

                            Approval for reassessment under the proviso to section 21(2) of the U.P. Trade Tax Act need not contain elaborate separate reasons if the approving authority applies its mind to the assessing authority's proposal; it is not required to act as an adjudicating authority, and mechanical approval alone is impermissible. Reassessment under section 21 cannot be sustained where it merely revisits an issue already examined in the original assessment, but reopening is not barred where the issue was not earlier considered. The text also states that section 3AB applies only where liquor and packing material are charged at a composite price, and does not extend to separately priced packing material.




                            Issues: (i) Whether approval for reassessment under the proviso to section 21(2) of the U.P. Trade Tax Act, 1948 was invalid for want of separate recorded reasons and want of application of mind; (ii) Whether reassessment under section 21 of the U.P. Trade Tax Act, 1948 could be sustained for the relevant assessment years, including on the question whether section 3AB applied where the price of liquor and packing material was charged separately.

                            Issue (i): Whether approval for reassessment under the proviso to section 21(2) of the U.P. Trade Tax Act, 1948 was invalid for want of separate recorded reasons and want of application of mind.

                            Analysis: The approving authority under the proviso to section 21(2) is required to satisfy itself on the basis of the reasons recorded by the assessing authority in the proposal. It is not the adjudicating authority and is not required to pass a detailed speaking order. At the same time, the approval cannot be mechanical and must reflect application of mind. On the facts, the approval order was not happily worded, but the challenge could not succeed merely for absence of separate detailed reasons.

                            Conclusion: The approval was not invalid merely because it did not contain separate elaborate reasons, though it had to be supported by application of mind.

                            Issue (ii): Whether reassessment under section 21 of the U.P. Trade Tax Act, 1948 could be sustained for the relevant assessment years, including on the question whether section 3AB applied where the price of liquor and packing material was charged separately.

                            Analysis: The Court accepted the settled view that section 3AB applies only where a composite price is charged for goods and packing material. Where the price of liquor and packing material is separately charged, the packing material does not get the benefit of exemption under section 3AB. The Court also held that reassessment for the years in which the original assessment had already examined and decided the issue was barred as a mere change of opinion, while for the years in which the original assessment order had not considered the issue, reopening could not be said to be based on change of opinion. The relevant legal position was treated as settled by the prior Division Bench decision and the circular was held to be in accord with the Act.

                            Conclusion: Reassessment was unsustainable for assessment years 1997-98 and 1998-99 as it was based on change of opinion, but it was valid for assessment years 1999-2000 and 2000-01; section 3AB did not apply where liquor and packing material were separately priced.

                            Final Conclusion: The petition succeeded only in part: the reassessment notices for two assessment years were quashed, while the notices for the remaining two assessment years were upheld, and the legal position on separate pricing and section 3AB was affirmed.

                            Ratio Decidendi: Approval for reassessment under the proviso to section 21(2) need not contain elaborate independent reasons if the authority applies its mind to the assessing authority's proposal, and reassessment cannot be sustained where it merely revisits a concluded issue on change of opinion; section 3AB applies only to composite pricing, not to separately charged packing material.


                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found