Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the reassessment order was barred by limitation under section 21 of the U.P. Trade Tax Act, 1948, and whether the Tribunal ignored the effect of sub-section (3) when the notice had been served within the prescribed period.
Analysis: Section 21(2) prescribes the outer period for making an assessment or reassessment, but it expressly operates subject to the other provisions of the section. Section 21(3) provides that where notice under section 21(1) is served within the period specified in sub-section (2), the assessment or reassessment may be completed within six months after the expiry of that period. As the notice had been served within time, the later assessment order could not be treated as time-barred merely because it was passed after the initial period referred to in sub-section (2).
Conclusion: The limitation objection was rejected, the Tribunal's view on bar of time was held erroneous, and the matter had to be decided on merits.