Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether penalty under section 15A(1)(o) of the U.P. Trade Tax Act was justified when form XXXI was produced immediately before seizure and the goods were released on furnishing security.
Analysis: The revision arose from penalty proceedings under the U.P. Trade Tax Act. The material on record showed that form XXXI, issued in connection with the railway contract, was produced immediately before seizure of the goods and that the goods were released thereafter. The finding of the authorities below that there was an intention to evade tax was not supported by the record, particularly when the relevant form had been duly filled and produced by the railway before the seizure and the goods were subsequently released on security.
Conclusion: The penalty under section 15A(1)(o) of the U.P. Trade Tax Act was not justified and was liable to be deleted.