Tribunal directs fresh assessment for tobacco and pan masala, exempts zarda sale prices under Schedule I.

The Tribunal remanded the case back to the assessing authority for fresh assessment, directing them to consider the distinct identity of "tobacco" and "pan masala" within the item "Double Mazza." The Tribunal held that the sale prices of "zarda" included in "Double Mazza" should be exempt under entry 82 of Schedule I to the 1994 Act. The applicant was instructed to provide the basis for determining the sale price for a fair assessment. The case was disposed of with no order as to costs.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Taxability of the item "Double Mazza" under the West Bengal Sales Tax Act, 1994.
2. Applicability of additional excise duty and its impact on sales tax.
3. Legal correctness of the orders passed by the assessing, appellate, and revisional authorities.

Summary:

1. Taxability of "Double Mazza":
The primary issue was whether "Double Mazza," sold in a pouch containing both "tobacco" and "pan masala," is a taxable item. The assessing authority determined that since the item is sold as a whole and cannot be segregated by the customer, it should be taxed under Schedule IV of the 1994 Act. The appellate authority upheld this view, stating that "pan masala" is not "zarda" or tobacco and falls under Schedule IV, making it taxable. The revisional authority also confirmed this, concluding that "pan masala" with "tobacco" does not fall within entry 82 of Schedule I to the 1994 Act.

2. Applicability of Additional Excise Duty:
The applicant argued that since additional excise duty was paid, sales tax should not be levied. However, the Tribunal noted that there is no exact correlation between the liability to pay additional excise duty and the levy of sales tax, as established by the Calcutta High Court in Prime Impex Limited v. Assistant Commissioner of Commercial Taxes [2002] 127 STC 23 (Cal).

3. Legal Correctness of Orders:
The Tribunal examined the orders of the assessing, appellate, and revisional authorities. It was observed that the item "Double Mazza" retains the distinct identity of "tobacco" and "pan masala" within the pouch. The Tribunal concluded that it would be unjustified to treat the entire item as an unspecified item. Therefore, the sale prices of "zarda" included in "Double Mazza" should merit exemption under entry 82 of Schedule I to the 1994 Act.

Conclusion:
The Tribunal remanded the matter back to the assessing authority for fresh assessment, instructing them to consider the observations made and allow reasonable opportunity to the applicant. The applicant must disclose the basis of determining the sale price of the disputed item to facilitate a fair assessment. The petition was disposed of with no order as to costs.

---