Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the notice for reassessment under Section 21 of the U.P. Trade Tax Act could be sustained on the basis of material discovered after the original assessment, and whether the case involved a mere change of opinion.
Analysis: The original assessment did not disclose or examine the purchases of diesel from outside the State of U.P. or its supply to transporters against price. After the assessment, survey material and seized books indicated such purchases and supplies, and the information furnished by the survey officer constituted material for formation of belief that income had escaped assessment. Since this aspect had not been adjudicated earlier, the proceeding was not founded on a mere change of opinion.
Conclusion: The approval to initiate reassessment and the notice under Section 21 were valid, and the challenge to them failed.