Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the revisional authority could invoke suo motu revisional powers under section 22A of the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957 when the assessment order was already under appeal before the Karnataka Appellate Tribunal.
Analysis: The appeal involved assessments which had already been carried in statutory appeal and then in second appeal before the Tribunal. The revisional action under section 22A was initiated despite the pending appellate proceedings. The Court applied the principle that once an assessment order is carried in appeal, the revisional authority cannot exercise revisional jurisdiction over the same subject matter, particularly when the statute places a bar under section 22A(3) and the Tribunal can consider the issues, including through cross-objections. The impugned revisional order therefore interfered with pending appellate adjudication and was beyond jurisdiction.
Conclusion: The revisional authority was not justified in invoking section 22A in the face of pending appeals before the Tribunal, and the impugned order was set aside in favour of the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The assessment matters were left to be pursued before the appellate forum, and the Revenue was permitted to raise its contentions by way of cross-objections in the pending appeals.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a statutory appeal is pending before the appellate tribunal, revisional jurisdiction cannot be exercised over the same order if the statute bars such intervention and the appellate forum can fully adjudicate the dispute.