Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the amended provisions relating to interest under the Central Sales Tax Act operated retrospectively from the date of the parent Act and could support levy of interest for periods prior to 12 May 2000.
Analysis: The questions referred arose from levy of interest on delayed payment of tax for assessment years prior to the amendment. The controlling provision was the validation introduced by section 120 of the Finance Act, 2000, by which section 9(2B) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 was treated as having effect retrospectively from the inception of the parent Act. The governing principle applied was that interest on delayed payment is compensatory in nature, and where tax remains unpaid after it becomes due, the revenue loss during the period of default justifies the levy in accordance with the validating amendment.
Conclusion: The amended provisions were held to operate retrospectively, and interest was leviable for the relevant earlier period. The referred questions were answered in favour of the State and against the respondent.