Mandatory delivery forms and proof of rejected goods determine penalty exposure for goods movement under VAT compliance.

Penalty under the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act remained sustainable where iron and steel goods were moved without the prescribed delivery forms, because the vehicle was intercepted without mandatory VAT-505 or VAT-515 documents. The claimed character of the consignment as rejected goods was not established by the record, as the invoices and accompanying papers pointed to a sale transaction and the excise endorsement alone was insufficient to show otherwise. In these circumstances, the revisional authority was justified in restoring the penalty for breach of the statutory documentation requirement.

---

---

Issues: Whether penalty under section 53(2) of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 was sustainable for movement of iron and steel goods without the prescribed delivery forms, and whether the assessee had established that the goods were rejected goods and not an inter-State sale.

Analysis: The goods were transported as special commodities and were required to be accompanied by the prescribed VAT delivery form. The record showed that the vehicle was checked without the mandatory form VAT-505 or VAT-515, and the available documents did not consistently prove that the consignment was merely the return of rejected goods. The invoices and related papers were treated as indicating a sale transaction, while the excise endorsement by itself was insufficient to establish that the movement was outside the ambit of a taxable sale. In these circumstances, the revisional authority was justified in restoring the penalty for contravention of the statutory requirement.

Conclusion: The penalty was upheld and the assessee's challenge failed; the decision was in favour of the Revenue.

Ratio Decidendi: Where goods are required by statute to be accompanied by prescribed delivery documents, failure to carry those documents justifies penalty, and a bare assertion that the goods were rejected goods will not defeat the consequence unless supported by reliable corroborative material.

---