Binding tax circulars and liberal machinery provisions can support acceptance of revised returns disclosing additional liability.

A statutory circular issued for tax administration binds departmental where it does not conflict with the Act. Applying that principle, belated revised returns disclosing additional tax liability were treated as capable of consideration under the Karnataka VAT scheme, because the machinery provisions on revised and incomplete returns are meant to support correction of errors and voluntary compliance. The impugned rejection was unsustainable because it ignored the circular, failed to consider relevant material, and showed non-application of mind even in respect of returns filed within time. The revised-return rejection, reassessment order and demand notice were quashed, and the matter was remanded for fresh consideration in accordance with the circular.

---

---

Issues: Whether the belated revised returns filed by the dealer, disclosing additional tax liability, were required to be considered in light of the Commissioner's circular and the statutory scheme governing revised returns and incomplete returns.

Analysis: Section 59(1) of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 empowers the Government and the Commissioner to issue instructions for the administration of the Act, and the officers are bound to follow them so long as they do not conflict with the statute. The circular dated 07.07.2008 permitted acceptance of revised returns filed beyond six months where they disclosed additional tax liability and directed initiation of reassessment proceedings. The object of the VAT regime, together with section 35(4) of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 and rule 39 of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Rules, 2005, supported a liberal approach to machinery provisions intended to correct errors and promote voluntary compliance. The impugned order ignored the circular, failed to consider relevant material, and also suffered from non-application of mind in rejecting returns for months that were within time.

Conclusion: The rejection of the revised returns and the consequential reassessment could not be sustained. The reassessment order and demand notice were quashed, and the matter was remanded for reconsideration of the revised returns in accordance with the circular.

Ratio Decidendi: Where a statutory circular issued for administration of the taxing statute is not contrary to the Act, it binds the departmental authorities, and machinery provisions intended to facilitate compliance should be construed liberally to advance voluntary compliance and correction of returns.

---