Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellate authority could enhance gross sales and make an adverse addition in appeal without serving the dealer a show-cause notice in Form 54 under Rule 251 of the West Bengal Sales Tax Rules, 1995, and whether the appellate and revisional orders were liable to be set aside.
Analysis: Rule 251(1) requires the appellate or revisional authority, when it seeks to rely on information that may lead to an adverse decision on escaped turnover, to serve notice in Form 54 and afford an opportunity of objection or representation. The appellate authority invoked Section 79(2)(b) of the West Bengal Sales Tax Act, 1994, but that provision only enlarges appellate power to consider matters arising from the proceedings; it does not dispense with the procedural safeguard prescribed by the Rules. The procedure under Rule 251(1) was treated as mandatory and in conformity with natural justice and fair play. Since no such notice had been served, the enhancement of gross sales could not be sustained.
Conclusion: The appellate enhancement without notice was unlawful, and the appellate and revisional orders were set aside with a direction for rehearing before the appellate authority.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the rules prescribe a specific procedure, especially a pre-decisional notice before an appellate authority may make an adverse enhancement, that procedure must be strictly followed and cannot be bypassed by reliance on the general appellate power.