Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether interest was leviable on the tax payable on purchases where exemption had been claimed on the basis of forms later found to be forged and the tax liability on those purchases was treated as escaped turnover.
Analysis: The exemption claim based on the disputed forms was rejected, and the purchases themselves were not in dispute. Once the forms were found to be forged and the exemption failed, the liability to pay tax on those purchases became an admitted tax liability under the Act. On the reasoning applied, interest followed under section 8(1) of the U.P. Sales Tax Act on the unpaid amount. The prior Division Bench view relied on by the Court was treated as covering the situation where a dealer claims exemption on the basis of forms but ultimately fails to furnish valid forms, making the tax payable an admitted liability and attracting interest at the prescribed rate. Forged or fictitious documents were held to confer no legal benefit.
Conclusion: Interest was leviable against the dealer, and the Tribunal was wrong in deleting the interest demand. The issue was decided in favour of the Revenue and against the dealer.
Ratio Decidendi: Where exemption from tax is claimed on the basis of forms that are subsequently found to be forged or invalid, the resulting tax on the underlying purchases becomes an admitted tax liability, and statutory interest is payable on the unpaid amount.