Just a moment...

Top
FeedbackReport
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By: ?
Even if Sort by Date is selected, exact match will be shown on the top.
RelevanceDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        Note

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Court dismisses one petition, grants another, declaring transactions as loans/barter, not sales. Decision based on statutory framework, public interest.</h1> <h3>Madras Refineries Ltd. Versus Assistant Commissioner, Central Assessment Circle IV, Chennai and others</h3> Madras Refineries Ltd. Versus Assistant Commissioner, Central Assessment Circle IV, Chennai and others - [2010] 28 VST 417 (Mad) Issues Involved:1. Taxability of the transaction regarding the import of crude oil.2. Nature of the loan transactions between oil companies.3. Jurisdiction of the assessing authority.4. Availability of alternative remedies.5. Constitutionality and statutory powers of the Oil Co-ordination Committee.6. Interpretation of 'sale' under the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act and Central Sales Tax Act.7. Appropriate relief and writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:1. Taxability of the transaction regarding the import of crude oil:The core issue was whether the import and subsequent transactions of crude oil among oil companies were taxable as sales under the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act and the Central Sales Tax Act. The court found that the transactions were loan transactions and not sales. The Oil Co-ordination Committee's scheme and the role of Indian Oil Corporation as the canalizing agent were central to this determination. The transactions were monitored and allocated by the Oil Co-ordination Committee to maintain uniform petroleum prices across India.2. Nature of the loan transactions between oil companies:The court examined the detailed procedure for loan transactions of crude oil, which included the allocation and re-allocation of crude oil among various refineries. These transactions were considered loans, not sales, as they involved the return of crude oil against security deposits without any transfer of property or sale consideration. The Oil Co-ordination Committee's role in these transactions was crucial, and the transactions were treated as barter or loan transactions.3. Jurisdiction of the assessing authority:The court addressed whether the assessing authority had jurisdiction to treat the transactions as sales. It was concluded that the assessing authority had the jurisdiction to assess the transactions but erred in treating them as sales. The court emphasized that the assessing authority's decision on the nature of the transaction was incorrect but within its jurisdiction.4. Availability of alternative remedies:The court noted that the petitioner had already availed of the alternative remedy by filing an appeal before the Deputy Commissioner (CT), Appeals, which remanded the matter for fresh consideration. Despite this, the court decided to address the issue substantively to avoid unnecessary delays and further litigation.5. Constitutionality and statutory powers of the Oil Co-ordination Committee:The Oil Co-ordination Committee was constituted by the Government of India under statutory powers to regulate the import, allocation, and distribution of crude oil. The court recognized the committee's role in maintaining uniform petroleum prices and coordinating the import and allocation of crude oil among refineries. The transactions were conducted under the committee's supervision, reinforcing their nature as loan transactions.6. Interpretation of 'sale' under the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act and Central Sales Tax Act:The court analyzed the definitions of 'sale' under both Acts and concluded that the transactions did not meet the criteria for a sale. There was no transfer of property, no sale consideration, and the transactions were not conducted under a contract of sale. The transactions were treated as loans or barter, not sales, and thus not subject to sales tax.7. Appropriate relief and writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India:The court exercised its powers under Article 226 to issue appropriate relief. It held that a writ of prohibition was not warranted as the assessing authority had jurisdiction, but its decision was incorrect. Instead, the court issued a writ of declaration, declaring the transactions as loan or barter transactions without the element of sale. This decision aimed to resolve the issue substantively and avoid further litigation.Conclusion:The court dismissed W.P. No. 9356 of 1998 as infructuous and allowed W.P. No. 9357 of 1998, issuing a writ of declaration that the transactions were loan or barter transactions without the element of sale. This decision was based on the statutory framework, the role of the Oil Co-ordination Committee, and the nature of the transactions, ensuring uniform petroleum prices and public interest.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found