Commercial identity test under VAT classification: processed fabric whitener and stiffener products fell under the residuary tax entry.

Processing or dilution that changes a raw material into a commercially distinct product with a different identity and use prevents classification of the finished goods under the original commodity entry for VAT purposes. Ujala Supreme, containing only a small proportion of acid violet paste and used as a fabric whitener, was held not to fall under the acid violets entry. Ujala Stiff and Shine, composed of polymerised vinyl acetate with water and fragrance and used as a laundry stiffening and shining agent, was also held outside the claimed specific entry. In the absence of a specific schedule entry, the products were treated as liable under the residuary tax entry.

---

---

Issues: Whether Ujala Supreme is classifiable as acid violets under entry 155(8)(d) of the Third Schedule to the Kerala Value Added Tax Act, 2003; whether Ujala Stiff and Shine is classifiable under entry 118(5) of the Third Schedule to the Kerala Value Added Tax Act, 2003; and whether both products are liable to tax under the residuary entry 103 of S.R.O. No. 82 of 2006.

Issue (i): Whether Ujala Supreme is classifiable as acid violets under entry 155(8)(d) of the Third Schedule to the Kerala Value Added Tax Act, 2003.

Analysis: The product was shown by the test reports to contain only a very small percentage of acid violet paste and predominantly water. The material on record established that acid violet paste is an industrial dye used for colouring silk and wool, whereas the marketed product was used only as a fabric whitener. On applying the test of whether the processed article retains the identity of the original commodity, the Court found that the dilution had destroyed the identity and use of the raw material and had produced a commercially distinct product.

Conclusion: Ujala Supreme was not classifiable under entry 155(8)(d) and the claim of the assessee was rejected.

Issue (ii): Whether Ujala Stiff and Shine is classifiable under entry 118(5) of the Third Schedule to the Kerala Value Added Tax Act, 2003.

Analysis: The laboratory report showed that the product contained polymerised vinyl acetate along with substantial water content and fragrance, and its use was as a laundry stiffening and shining agent. The Court held that the processed product was commercially different from the raw material and could not be identified as the original polymer in primary form. The fact that HSN-based classification was relied upon did not assist the assessee because the finished product had a distinct composition, identity, and use.

Conclusion: Ujala Stiff and Shine was not classifiable under entry 118(5) and the claim of the assessee was rejected.

Issue (iii): Whether both products were liable to tax under the residuary entry 103 of S.R.O. No. 82 of 2006.

Analysis: Once the products were held not to fall within the specific entries of the Third Schedule, the State was entitled under section 6(1)(d) to prescribe the rate of tax by notification for goods not covered by the Second or Third Schedule. The Court accepted that entry 103 was the residuary entry applicable to goods not otherwise specifically covered and that the products, being fabric whitener and stiffener products, fell outside the specific schedule entries relied on by the assessee.

Conclusion: Both products were rightly brought under residuary entry 103 of S.R.O. No. 82 of 2006.

Final Conclusion: The appeal failed, and the Commissioner's classification of both products under the residuary notification entry was upheld.

Ratio Decidendi: Where processing or dilution converts a raw material into a commercially distinct product with a different identity and use, the finished product cannot be classified as the original commodity for VAT purposes and may fall under the residuary entry if no specific schedule entry applies.

---