Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Tribunal could rectify its earlier order under section 22 of the U.P. Trade Tax Act, 1948 after the levy of tax under section 3AAAA was subsequently upheld and the earlier view treating the provision as ultra vires stood displaced by retrospective amendment.
Analysis: The levy had earlier been set aside because section 3AAAA had been declared ultra vires, but the provision was later amended retrospectively and upheld as valid legislation. In that situation, the earlier order of the Tribunal proceeded on an error of law in treating the levy as invalid. The rectification power under section 22 was held to extend to correcting such a mistake. The objection based on the time period for making the rectification application was rejected in view of the principle that a valid retrospective amendment and the consequent validity of the levy justified rectification of the erroneous order.
Conclusion: The Tribunal was competent to rectify the order under section 22 of the U.P. Trade Tax Act, 1948, and the challenge to the rectification failed.