Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the stock variation assessment required remand for consideration of the reconciliation statement and compliance with the governing additional evidence before the Tribunal.
Analysis: The Tribunal is the final fact-finding authority and can receive fresh evidence only in accordance with the prescribed regulations. A party seeking to place additional documentary material must comply with the conditions for adducing fresh evidence under Regulation 12 of the Tamil Nadu Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal Regulations, 1959. In the present matter, the reconciliation statement was said to have been handed over at the hearing, and the Court found that the issue of stock variation should be examined on the basis of that material, especially since the annual maintenance contract turnover issue had already been remanded on a similar footing.
Conclusion: The matter relating to stock variation was remanded to the assessing officer for fresh examination in the light of the reconciliation statement and for orders in accordance with law.