Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether an application to set aside an ex parte order or seek restoration under Regulation 9(2) of the Tamil Nadu Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal Regulations could be entertained without enclosing the original order, and how limitation under Regulation 9(3) was to be reckoned where service of the order was disputed or not shown.
Analysis: The remedy under Regulation 9(2) was held to be available even without producing the original order. The requirement of the original order was treated as relevant only when the date of communication of the order was in dispute, because limitation under Regulation 9(3) depends on communication of the order. If the Tribunal's records do not show service of the order, limitation does not begin to run, and an application for setting aside the ex parte order can be entertained without a condone-delay petition. If the records show service, a delay condonation application would be necessary. The petitioner was therefore directed to pursue the statutory restoration remedy before the Tribunal.
Conclusion: The petitioner was permitted to file applications under Regulation 9(2), and the Tribunal was directed to entertain them without insisting on the original order. The question of delay was left to be decided according to whether the Tribunal's records showed service of the order.