Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether iron and steel rods (sariya) manufactured from ingots purchased from units enjoying exemption under section 4A of the U.P. Trade Tax Act, 1948 were liable to trade tax at four per cent on the finished goods.
Analysis: The dispute concerned levy of trade tax on finished sariya manufactured by the assessee. The raw material, namely ingots, had been purchased from new units enjoying exemption under section 4A and therefore no tax had been paid at that stage. The Court noted that iron and steel were taxable at the point of manufacture or import and that, where the raw material had already borne tax, the effective burden on other manufacturers was two per cent on raw material and two per cent on finished goods, making four per cent in all. The office memorandum dated May 21, 1994 was relied upon to show that the tax on sariya was leviable at four per cent, subject to reduction where tax had already been paid on the raw material. As the assessee had paid nil tax on the raw material, there was no basis for reducing the rate on the finished product.
Conclusion: The assessee was liable to pay trade tax at four per cent on the finished goods, and the levy made by the assessing authority was upheld.
Final Conclusion: The revision was rejected after affirming the tax liability fixed on the finished product manufactured from exempt raw material.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the raw material for manufacture has suffered no tax because it was purchased from an exempt unit, the full notified tax rate may be levied on the finished product so as to maintain the statutory tax incidence at the prescribed level.