Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessment and revisional orders treating the DEPB sale as an intra-State sale could be sustained when they were based only on the earlier Andhra Pradesh Sales Tax Tribunal observation, and whether the matter required fresh assessment.
Analysis: The revisional and assessing authorities proceeded on the footing that the sale of DEPBs was an intra-State sale within Orissa, but their conclusion rested substantially on the Andhra Pradesh Sales Tax Tribunal's observation. That observation had already been set aside by the Supreme Court, which held that the Tribunal had gone beyond the limited question before it and that no sufficient material had been examined to support a finding that the transactions were intra-State sales in Orissa. In the absence of independent material and fresh consideration of the relevant facts, the findings recorded by the authorities could not stand. The notice under rule 80 and the resulting assessment under section 12(4) were therefore vulnerable.
Conclusion: The writ petition succeeded. The assessment order and revisional order were set aside and the matter was remitted for fresh assessment after giving the petitioner an opportunity to produce documents and after the authority considered the materials independently.