Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether old gold ornaments contributed by partners to the firm as capital and brought into stock-in-trade attracted purchase tax under section 5A of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963.
Analysis: The ornaments were credited to the partners' capital accounts and treated by the firm as trading stock. The firm was free to sell the ornaments as such or after polishing, repair, or remaking, and in fact remade them into new ornaments and sold them in the course of business. The earlier decision dealing with liability under section 5(1) of the Act at the hands of the transferor did not govern purchase tax liability in the hands of the firm. After the introduction of Explanation (3D) to section 2(xxi), a transfer may be deemed to be a sale and purchase, but the transfer by a partner to the firm as capital contribution still did not attract tax under section 5(1) because it was not in the course of business. The transferee firm's purchase, however, was taxable under section 5A because the goods were taken as stock-in-trade and dealt with commercially.
Conclusion: The assessment under section 5A was rightly sustained and the challenge to it failed.